Supreme Court upholds SC/ST Amendment Act
The Supreme Court has upheld the constitutional validity of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities)
Amendment Act, 2018.
- The
Amendment Act nullified the Court’s 20th March,
2018 judgment which had diluted the stringent
provisions of the
original Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of
Atrocities) Act, 1989.
- Petitions were filed challenging the 2018
Amendment Act on the grounds of violation of the fundamental right to equality
(Article 14) and personal liberty (Article 21).
Salient Features of the Amendment Act,
2018
- It added Section 18A to the original Act.
- It
delineates SPECIFIC CRIMES against SCs &
STs as atrocities and describes
strategies and prescribes punishments to counter these acts.
- It identifies what acts constitute “atrocities” and all offences listed in the Act are COGNIZABLE. The police can arrest the
offender without a warrant and start an investigation into the case without taking any orders from the
court.
- The Act
calls upon all the states to convert
an existing SESSIONS COURT
in each district into a SPECIAL COURT to try cases
registered under it and provides
for the appointment of Public
Prosecutors/Special Public Prosecutors for conducting cases in special courts.
- It creates provisions for states to declare
areas with high levels of caste violence to be “ATROCITY-PRONE” and to appoint
qualified officers to monitor and maintain law and order.
- It provides for the punishment for
wilful neglect of duties by non-SC/ST public servants.
- It is implemented by the State Governments and Union
Territory Administrations, which are provided
due central assistance.
Section 18A states that
- For the
Prevention of Atrocities Act, the preliminary
enquiry shall not be required for registration of a FIR against any person.
- The
provision of section 438 (pre-arrest
bail) of the Code
of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) shall not
apply to a case under the Act, notwithstanding any judgment or order or direction of any Court.
- The provision
of anticipatory bail under Section
438 was introduced when Criminal Procedure
Code (CrPC) was amended
in 1973.
- Anticipatory
bail is a direction
to release a person on bail, issued EVEN
BEFORE THE PERSON IS ARRESTED. It is only issued by the Sessions
Court and High
Court.
- An application
for anticipatory bail can be filed in cases of non-bailable offences.
- Time
limit: The Supreme
Court (SC) in Sushila
Aggarwal v. State of NCT of Delhi (2020) case ruled
that no time limit can be set while granting anticipatory Bail and it can
continue even until the end of the trial.
- Need for such protection
- An accused, besides being an accused, may also be the primary caregiver or sole breadwinner of the family. His arrest may leave his loved ones in a state of starvation and neglect.
- In the 1980 Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia vs State of Punjab case, a five-judge Supreme Court bench led by then Chief Justice Y V Chandrachud ruled that 438 (1) is to be interpreted in the light of Article 21 of the Constitution (protection of life and personal liberty).
Comments
Post a Comment